Showing posts with label Ohio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ohio. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 21, 2023

Ohio Bill to Move Presidential Primary to May Has Second Committee Hearing

The Ohio legislation to shift the presidential primary in the Buckeye state from March to May had a second hearing before the House Government Oversight Committee on Tuesday, March 21. 

The hearing was short and sweet. Testimony on just three bills was heard and the panel made quick work of them. That included HB 21, the bill introduced by Rep. Daniel Troy (D-23rd, Willowick) to make May the uniform primary position in Ohio regardless of election year. Troy spoke on the measure in late February, but this time, it was Gail E. Garbrandt of the Ohio Association of Elections Officials who gave testimony on behalf  her bipartisan group in support of the legislation. 

Garbrandt echoed many of the points Troy made in the February hearing, espousing the virtues of "election processes and procedures [that] are uniform, consistent, and easily understandable for our voters." But she also made the case about further reducing the burdens on taxpayers and election administrators. The March primary increases costs because the filing deadline falls during the holiday season at the end of the preceding year when overtime pay is often required in order for election officials to meet state-mandated deadlines. 

The committee once again failed to pose any questions to the lone witness, and it remains unclear whether the case has been successfully made to the committee for moving the primary in presidential years. That silence could mean a lot of things. However, it is worth acknowledging the fact that Ohio has managed to pull off primary elections every March since 1996. Proponents of the change push back on the idea of Ohio being a big draw in any of those seven cycles. And while that may be the case, it is also true that seven cycles have created a measure of consistency in the Ohio election calendar that bill supporters would interrupt in order to establish a "uniform, consistent and easily understandable" primary permanently scheduled for May in all years. That may or may not be convincing to the members of Government Oversight.

Tuesday, February 21, 2023

May Presidential Primary Bill Gets First Committee Hearing in Ohio House

The House version of an Ohio bill to move the Buckeye state presidential primary from March to May came before the Government Oversight Committee on Tuesday, February 21.

HB 21 sponsor, Rep. Daniel Troy (D-23rd, Willowick) introduced the measure and advocated for the date change before the panel, a committee on which three of the bill's co-sponsors sit. Troy did not break any new ground, leaning on the same arguments he has made publicly:
  • Candidates for all federal, state, and county offices will not have to be filing petitions for nomination to be on the November ballot, almost 11 months prior to that actual election in the preceding calendar year. 
  • Voter confusion will be minimized with a consistent date every spring (and assuredly better weather). 
  • With the redistricting process looming again, it provides more time to get all the ducks in a row before filing deadlines. 
  • It will shorten the election season and potentially allow more time for governing and less time for partisan politics.
  • And all of that went over well enough. It seemed. There were few tea leaves to read in this the bill's first hearing, but when the floor was opened for questions from the rest of the committee, only silence followed. Rep. Troy could only respond, "I guess that means it's a good bill."

    To which committee chair, Rep. Bob Peterson (R-91st, Fayette) responded, "Unless it's a bad bill."

    And that was it. Even with a bipartisan trio of co-sponsors on the 13 person committee, HB 21 likely faces an uphill climb among Republicans in control of enough of the levers of state governmental power to derail a move back on the presidential primary calendar ahead of a cycle in which the GOP will have a competitive nomination battle. 


    Wednesday, February 8, 2023

    Ohio Secretary of State's Office Dismisses Need to Move Presidential Primary to May

    The language of a forthcoming bill to shift the presidential primary in Ohio to May is not even public yet and there is already resistance forming to the idea.

    "Rob Nichols, a spokesman for Secretary of State Frank LaRose, told The Ohio Star that voters have handled the two primary dates in the past. 'It’s up to the General Assembly to set the time, place and manner of Ohio’s elections, but voters are pretty resilient. They’ve adapted to the earlier presidential primary date just fine in past elections.'”

    And that is true. Ohio voters have gone to the polls for a presidential primary in March in the last seven presidential cycles dating back to 1996. And in three of those cycles -- 2000, 2004 and 2012 -- the Ohio primary was on Super Tuesday. But Republicans in control of state government nudged the primary date back in recent years in order to adopt a true winner-take-all delegate allocation system that would comply under national party rules. 

    And maintaining that combination -- early primary (that is more likely to put Ohio voters in a position to weigh in before the races are effective over) and those winner-take-all rules along with a competitive Republican presidential nomination battle in 2024 -- is likely to keep most Republicans in the legislature and behind the governor's desk from lining up in support of this legislation. 

    ...despite a bipartisan group sponsoring the measure to move the primary to May and the backing of election administrators across the Buckeye state, who want a uniform primary date (in May) in all even-numbered years. 

    Winner-take-all allocation would be an option for Ohio Republicans in May, but the competition may (or may not) last that deep into the calendar.

    Friday, February 3, 2023

    Bill in the Works to Move Ohio Presidential Primary to May

    Statehouse News is reporting that legislation is on the way in Columbus to move the presidential primary in Ohio back on the calendar to May. 

    Rep. Daniel Troy (D-23rd, Willowick) and eight co-sponsors -- seven Democrats and one Republican -- are behind the legislation:
    “Ohio’s influence on that process in my opinion has proven to be dubious at best and it’s time to return to a normal and consistent election schedule," Troy said. 

    Troy said moving the presidential primary to May will have another benefit — a shorter political season. With the March primary, he said candidates start running for office right after the November election in the preceding year. He said moving the presidential primary to May would shorten the election season and potentially allow more time for governing and less time for partisan politics.
    But despite the various pressures created by a March primary on the heels of off-year elections in November the previous year, Ohio has managed to pull it off every cycle since 1996. There has been some redistricting-related drama in getting and keeping the presidential primary in March in some cycles -- as was the case for 2012 -- but it has consistently been scheduled for and conducted sometime in March. 

    This legislation may find a fair hearing in a lower chamber where a bipartisan power-sharing coalition runs the show, but may face stiffer resistance in the Republican-controlled Senate. And that is especially true given that a competitive Republican presidential nomination race is on the horizon.

    Sunday, November 1, 2020

    The Electoral College Map (11/1/20)

    Update for November 1.


    Well, if Saturday was a break from what have often been quiet weekends on the polling front in the 2020 presidential race, then Sunday was a decibel-filled cacophony. There were new data from 57 polls in 16 states -- plus surveys that covered both congressional districts in Maine and the second in Nebraska -- and it was all concentrated in the 13 states from New Mexico on the left to Texas on the right in the heart of the Electoral College Spectrum order. 

    What was unique about this batch of new surveys was that a raft of them came from right-leaning pollsters. And across the states that count -- those six core battlegrounds of Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin -- the margins all decreased, benefiting President Trump. However, there are two sizable caveats to that. First, despite the decreases, the map and projection remained unchanged after the introduction of those polls. That means that none of those battlegrounds changed categories. But second, in drilling down just a smidgen, there was either no movement or movement toward Biden since the last polls in the majority of surveys in those series. 

    They may have -- and may yet on Monday -- flood the zone with new polls, but those data from right-leaning pollsters are unlikely to change anything around here before tomorrow. Even Georgia, which has lately been precariously perched on either side of the partisan line has shifted enough into the Biden column at this point, that it, too, is likely locked in there. Again, this has been a steady race, and while these polls may have brought down the average margins some in states where Biden has been ahead throughout, in the end it is but a small sliver of a change.

    On to the polls...


    Polling Quick Hits:
    Arizona
    (Trump 50, Biden 48 via AtlasIntel | Biden 48, Trump 46 via Emerson | Biden 49, Trump 43 via Siena/NYT Upshot | Biden 50, Trump 46 via CNN | Biden 50, Trump 47 via Y2 Analytics)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +2.89] 
    No previous AtlasIntel poll
    Emerson: Biden 53, Trump 47 in August poll
    Siena: Biden 49, Trump 41 in early October poll
    CNN: Biden 49, Trump 45 in July poll
    No previous Y2 Analytics poll

    FHQ will start each of these polling vignettes today with the current FHQ average in each state. In Arizona, Biden's (rounded) advantage is 48-45. Of the day's polls in the Grand Canyon state, Emerson, CNN and Y2 Analytics most fall in line with that long established state of affairs in Arizona. It is and has been close, but it has also, more often than not been tipped in the former vice president's direction in individual polls. There is some narrowing across a few of these from their last iterations, but it is not to the level of tightening that the president is going to need to pull out wins in some of these states below. 


    Colorado
    (Biden 53, Trump 41 via Keating Research)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +12.82] 
    Keating: Biden 54, Trump 39 in mid-October poll

    Currently, the averages in this former perennial battleground has Biden out to a 53-40 (rounded) lead. Colorado simply has not been close in 2020 and is not still in an update that falls right on the candidates' averages here.


    Florida
    (Trump 47, Biden 46 via Susquehanna | Biden 48, Trump 47 via Pulse Opinion Research | Biden 47, Trump 44 via Siena/NYT Upshot | Biden 49, Trump 48 via St. Pete Polls | Biden 52, Trump 46 via Emerson | Biden 51, Trump 47 via RMG Research | Trump 50, Biden 48 via ABC/WaPo | Biden 49, Trump 47 via YouGov/CCES)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +2.88] 
    Susquehanna: Trump 49, Biden 44 in poll last week
    Pulse Opinion Research: Trump 50, Biden 46 in mid-October poll
    Siena: Biden 47, Trump 42 in early October poll
    St. Pete Polls: Biden 49, Trump 47 in mid-October poll
    Emerson: Biden 51, Trump 48 in mid-October poll
    RMG Research: Biden 50, Trump 48 in mid-October poll
    ABC/WaPo: Trump 51, Biden 47 in September poll
    No previous YouGov/CCES poll

    In the Sunshine state, Trump lags Biden by a 49-46 (rounded) margin, and most of the eight new polls out of Florida today fit right in that general range. There are some exceptions like Susquehanna, but it remains a steady picture in this case. Like Arizona, it has been close in Florida almost all along. There was a brief five day period in late July when the Sunshine state drifted over into Lean Biden territory, but that moment was fleeting. Yet, the fact remains that as close as Florida has been, it has been consistently tipped toward the former vice president throughout much of 2020. The addition of these polls does not alter that. Even the polls that had Trump ahead -- Susquehanna, RMG and WaPo -- all either saw no shift since the last polls in the series or tightening that benefited Biden. And surveys that moved toward Trump tended to bring them in line with the prevailing average in the state at FHQ.


    Georgia
    (Trump 48, Biden 46 via Insider Advantage | Biden 49, Trump 49 via Emerson | Biden 48, Trump 47 via YouGov/CCES)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +0.36] 
    No previous Insider Advantage poll
    Emerson: Trump 48, Biden 47 in mid-October poll
    No previous YouGov/CCES poll

    In the Peach state, once the average shares of both candidates are rounded, the count comes to a 47-47 tie. And again, the new surveys are largely in line with that. Only the Emerson poll offered a comparison to an earlier poll, and even there, the change was minimal. Georgia is close, the closest state on the board at the moment. 


    Iowa
    (Trump 49, Biden 48 via Civiqs | Trump 49, Biden 47 via Emerson | Trump 48, Biden 46 via Insider Advantage | Trump 48, Biden 41 via Selzer)
    [Current FHQ margin: Trump +0.89] 
    Civiqs: Biden 48, Trump 47 in early October poll
    Emerson: Trump 48, Biden 48 in mid-October poll
    Insider Advantage: Trump 45, Biden 45 in mid-October poll
    Selzer: Trump 49, Biden 47 in September poll

    Speaking of the closest states on the board, Iowa also fits that bill with Trump maintaining a narrow 47-46 (rounded) edge in the FHQ averages. Again, as in Georgia above, most of the new polls today are consistent with that established average. However, the one that stands out is the one that is often called he gold standard of polling in the Hawkeye state. And in that Selzer poll, the president stayed in the upper 40s like the last survey in September but Biden trailed off, dropping in to the low 40s. What is different from that last poll to the latest update is that five percent of the respondents refused to say who they were supporting in the new one. That was a segment of the electorate that was not accounted for in the previous poll. The crosstabs on that subsample of around 40 respondents in that poll would have been interesting to look at; not necessarily representative, but interesting. 


    Maine
    (Biden 54, Trump 43 via Emerson
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +13.40] 

    Maine CD1
    (Biden 58, Trump 39 via Emerson
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +22.92] 

    Maine CD2
    (Biden 50, Trump 47 via Emerson
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +1.88] 
    No previous Emerson poll

    FHQ will keep the focus in Maine on the second congressional district where the competition is. There has been no previous Emerson poll of the Pine Tree state, so there is no natural comparison, but Biden's lead in the averages there has stabilized around 47-45 (rounded). That is behind this poll of the district, yet not exactly inconsistent with it. Although there have been just 14 surveys in the field in ME CD2, 11 of them have favored the former vice president. Like the rest of those other toss ups close to the partisan line on the Biden side, the second is and has been close throughout, but consistently tilted toward the Democratic nominee. 


    Michigan
    (Biden 53, Trump 45 via Ipsos | Biden 49, Trump 47 via Insider Advantage | Biden 52, Trump 46 via Emerson | Biden 53, Trump 41 via CNN | Biden 52, Trump 45 via Mitchell Research | Biden 48, Trump 41 via EPIC-MRA)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +7.31] 
    Ipsos: Biden 53, Trump 43 in poll last week
    No previous Insider Advantage poll
    Emerson: Biden 54, Trump 43 in early October poll
    CNN: Biden 52, Trump 40 in July poll
    Mitchell: Biden 52, Trump 42 in poll last week
    EPIC-MRA: Biden 48, Trump 39 in mid-October poll
     
    Here is the deal in the Great Lakes state: Biden is already averaging over a 50 percent share of support there. Despite the fact that each of these polls today -- those with a predecessor in the series anyway -- show some narrowing, it is almost all on the Trump side of the equation. The former vice president is still stable and at or over the majority mark in each of these updates. The president may or may not close the gap some on election day, but if Biden is over 50 percent, it will not matter. 


    Minnesota
    (Biden 54, Trump 39 via St. Cloud State
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +8.52] 
    No previous St. Cloud State poll

    This St. Cloud State survey of the North Star state may be on the high side of the range for Biden and low side for Trump, but it remains in line with the 51-42 (rounded) average the race is currently at under the FHQ methodology. And as was said in Saturday's update, other than the Survey USA series, the majority of pollsters have generally found a race with Biden over 50 percent and Trump stuck in the low 40s, the latter of which is in the range of the president's overall job approval numbers nationally. 


    Nebraska CD2
    (Biden 50, Trump 48 via Emerson)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +6.69] 
    No previous Emerson poll

    The difference between this latest poll and the FHQ averages for NE CD2 are fairly stark. As of now, Biden holds a 51-44 (rounded) lead that looks a lot like the early polls out of the district over the summer. But that discrepancy likely has more to do with the general lack of polling activity in the Omaha area this year. The big polling issue on the state level in 2016 was that there were not a lot of polls in the field in the days before the election. Now, the swing is much less likely to be as large this time around -- there are fewer undecideds after all -- but the same sort of thing could be happening Nebraska's second as election day nears and partisans/partisan leaners come home. Regardless, Biden has been at or over 50 percent in all but one of the (yes, just) six public polls conducted in the district in 2020.


    Nevada
    (Biden 49, Trump 47 via Emerson)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +4.34] 
    No previous Emerson poll
     
    Nevada is another jurisdiction where polling has been lacking all year, but where Biden has trailed only once. This Emerson poll hits the vice president's average FHQ share but has Trump running about three points ahead of his average share of support. That tighter margin may be partisans coming home to the president, Biden struggling with Latinos in the state and/or signs of the vaunted Harry Reid turnout machine faltering in the midst of a global pandemic. But the Silver state is another state where it is striking how close the Democratic nominee is to 50 percent. He is not there in this case, but Biden is approaching it in a way that neither Clinton nor Trump did four years ago. 


    New Mexico
    (Biden 54, Trump 42 via Research & Polling Inc.)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +10.64] 
    Research & Polling: Biden 54, Trump 39 in September poll

    In the Land of Enchantment, the FHQ averages have the race for the state's five electoral votes at 53-42 (rounded) in favor of the former vice president. This poll is evidence of the race coming in line with that more than it is about Trump gaining ground. This may have been a flip opportunity -- or a state that was eyed as one by the president's campaign operation -- but that has not panned out in any of the New Mexico polling in 2020.  


    North Carolina
    (Trump 50, Biden 48 via AtlasIntel | Trump 48, Biden 44 via Insider Advantage | Biden 47, Trump 47 via Emerson | Biden 51, Trump 45 via CNN | Trump 49, Biden 47 via Trafalgar Group | Biden 49, Trump 45 via YouGov/CCES)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +1.77] 
    No previous AtlasIntel poll
    No previous Insider Advantage poll
    Emerson: Biden 49, Trump 49 in mid-October poll
    CNN: Biden 49, Trump 46 in September poll
    Trafalgar: Trump 49, Biden 46 in poll last week
    No previous YouGov/CCES poll

    Only half of the polls out today in North Carolina had a previous survey to which to compare, and two of those had Trump uncharacteristically ahead in a state where Biden has carried a narrow but consistent lead in the FHQ averages for much of the year. Currently, Biden is up 48-46 (rounded) and most of the surveys today are consistent with that. Some, like the CNN poll have Biden running toward the top end of this range while others like AtlasIntel have the president outperforming his average. The margin may have inched down a tick, but it remains tipped in Biden's direction in the Tar Heel state. 


    Ohio
    (Trump 49, Biden 48 via Civiqs | Biden 50, Trump 49 via Emerson)
    [Current FHQ margin: Trump +0.95] 
    Civiqs: Trump 50, Biden 47 in mid-October poll
    Emerson: Trump 51, Biden 49 in May poll

    One could make a mountain out of a molehill and suggest that the gap narrowed in both Buckeye state polls released today, but the truth is that both maintain an established status quo Trump lead in Ohio. With election day in sight, the president's 47-46 (rounded) advantage in the FHQ averages of Ohio are reflected in both surveys. But the key is less about who leads than how much Ohio has swung toward the Democrats since 2016. The shift there is in line with the seven point average swing across the whole country in 2020 polls. That Ohio is close at all is the story here. Whether Biden can flip it or Trump narrowly defend it is mostly immaterial to the quest for 270 electoral votes (especially in the winning Biden scenarios). 


    Pennsylvania
    (Biden 52, Trump 46 via Ipsos | Trump 49, Biden 47 via Insider Advantage | Biden 49, Trump 43 via Siena/NYT Upshot | Biden 52, Trump 47 via Emerson | Trump 50, Biden 49 via AtlasIntel | Biden 51, Trump 44 via ABC/WaPo | Biden 52, Trump 44 via YouGov/CCES)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +5.28] 
    Ipsos: Biden 51, Trump 44 in poll last week
    Insider Advantage: Trump 48, Biden 46 in poll last week
    Siena: Biden 49, Trump 42 in early October poll
    Emerson: Biden 51, Trump 47 in early October poll
    No previous AtlasIntel poll
    ABC/WaPo: Biden 54, Trump 45 in September poll
    No previous YouGov/CCES poll

    There is a prevailing take home that has emerged in the most frequently surveyed state in the 2020 presidential race. The first point on the checklist is always to ask whether Biden is around 50 percent and if Trump is in the mid-40s. This batch of polls checks that box for the most part. Those that do not, like the Emerson survey show no real movement poll-to-poll from the last update, have Biden over the majority mark (ABC/WaPo) or have the president ahead in a state where polls have shown that less than a tenth of the time. But that 50-44 (rounded) edge the former vice president has had has been among the most consistent realities of this race for months. That consistency has kept the Keystone state firmly lodged in the tipping point position well inside Biden's coalition of states.


    Texas
    (Trump 50, Biden 49 via Emerson | Trump 50, Biden 45 via Gravis Marketing | Trump 49, Biden 47 via YouGov/CCES)
    [Current FHQ margin: Trump +1.45] 
    Emerson: Trump 52, Biden 48 in May poll
    Gravis: Trump 46, Biden 44 in July poll
    No previous YouGov/CCES poll

    Like Iowa and Ohio, Texas has been a state that has swung toward the Democrats since 2016, but shifted in a manner that is in line with the average change across the country. That has made the Lone Star state look much more competitive in 2020, but it continues to be basically the North Carolina of the Trump side of the partisan line. The president has led throughout, but has maintained a narrow -- and at this point 48-46 (rounded) -- edge in the FHQ averages. The newly added surveys do little to disrupt that general outlook in Texas. 


    Utah
    (Trump 51, Biden 44 via Y2 Analytics)
    [Current FHQ margin: Trump +13.44] 
    Y2 Analytics: Trump 50, Biden 40 in early October poll

    Look, this is among the rosiest polls a Democrat will likely ever get in the Beehive state. But then, the Y2 Analytics series of polls this year in Utah, has been that way for Joe Biden. But the fact remains that no Democrat has cleared 40 percent in Utah since Johnson carried the state in 1964. Obama came closest in 2008 with 35 percent there, but this series polls stands out in a state where the FHQ average has settled in at 52-39 (rounded) with Trump out in front.


    Wisconsin
    (Biden 51, Trump 47 via Civiqs | Biden 53, Trump 45 via Ipsos | Biden 51, Trump 49 via AtlasIntel | Biden 53, Trump 45 via Emerson | Biden 49, Trump 46 via Susquehanna | Biden 52, Trump 41 via Siena/NYT Upshot | Trump 52, Biden 44 via CNN)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +6.39] 
    Civiqs: Biden 53, Trump 45 in mid-October poll
    Ipsos: Biden 53, Trump 44 in poll last week
    No previous AtlasIntel poll
    Emerson: Biden 52, Trump 45 in September poll
    Susquehanna: Biden 46, Trump 45 in mid-October poll
    Siena: Trump 51, Biden 41 in mid-October poll
    CNN: Biden 52, Trump 42 in September poll

    There just is not that much different from one poll to the latest in this group of new surveys out of the Badger state. And two of the three polls that find a greater than one point change increase the former vice president's advantage there. But the bigger thing in Wisconsin is that Biden's average FHQ share has now, as in Michigan, surpassed the 50 percent threshold, a point he passes in six of the seven new polls today. Trump does not need Wisconsin, but with Biden north of 50 percent at FHQ in both Michigan and Wisconsin now, the president's margin for error is quite low. Without those two, Trump absolutely has to run the table through the Biden toss ups and claim the one remaining blue wall state he flipped (and where Biden is barely below 50 percent at FHQ), Pennsylvania. 



    NOTE: 


    The Electoral College Spectrum1
    DC-3
    VT-3
    (6)2
    NJ-14
    (156)
    NE CD2-1
    WI-10
    (253)
    AK-3
    (125)
    TN-11
    (60)
    MA-11
    (17)
    OR-7
    (163)
    PA-203
    (273 | 285)
    MO-10
    (122)
    KY-8
    (49)
    MD-10
    (27)
    IL-20
    (183)
    NV-6
    (279 | 265)
    SC -9
    (112)
    SD-3
    (41)
    HI-4
    (31)
    ME-2
    (185)
    AZ-11
    (290 | 259)
    MT-3
    NE CD1-1
    (103)
    AL-9
    (38)
    NY-29
    (60)
    CO-9
    (194)
    FL-29
    (319 | 248)
    KS-6
    (99)
    ID-4
    (29)
    CA-55
    (115)
    VA-13
    (207)
    ME CD2-1
    NC-15
    (335 | 219)
    IN-11
    (93)
    AR-6
    (25)
    DE-3
    (118)
    NH-4
    (211)
    GA-16
    (351 | 203)
    NE-2
    (82)
    OK-7
    (19)
    WA-12
    (130)
    NM-5
    (216)
    IA-6
    (187)
    UT-6
    (80)
    ND-3
    (12)
    CT-7
    ME CD1-1
    (138)
    MN-10
    (226)
    OH-18
    (181)
    MS-6
    (74)
    WV-5
    (9)
    RI-4
    (142)
    MI-16
    (242)
    TX-38
    (163)
    LA-8
    (68)
    WY-3
    NE CD3-1
    (4)
    1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

    2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he or she won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Trump won all the states up to and including Pennsylvania (Biden's toss up states plus the Pennsylvania), he would have 285 electoral votes. Trump's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Biden's number is on the left and Trump's is on the right in bold italics.

    3 Pennsylvania
     is the state where Biden crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election, the tipping point state. The tipping point cell is shaded in yellow to denote that and the font color is adjusted to attempt to reflect the category in which the state is.

    57 new polls from 16 states and another poll out of the second district in Nebraska led to the following changes:
    • Nebraska CD2 moves into the middle column at the very top, a once cell shift toward the partisan line.
    • Arizona and Florida traded spots on the Electoral College Spectrum with the Sunshine state moving closer the partisan line. 
    • Speaking of the partisan line, Maine CD2 moved away from it and to the other side of North Carolina in the order. 
    • Wisconsin saw Joe Biden's share of support push across the 50 percent barrier there. 

    2 days to go.


    Where things stood at FHQ two days before election day (or close to it) in...
    2016
    2012
    2008


    --
    NOTE: Distinctions are made between states based on how much they favor one candidate or another. States with a margin greater than 10 percent between Biden and Trump are "Strong" states. Those with a margin of 5 to 10 percent "Lean" toward one of the two (presumptive) nominees. Finally, states with a spread in the graduated weighted averages of both the candidates' shares of polling support less than 5 percent are "Toss Up" states. The darker a state is shaded in any of the figures here, the more strongly it is aligned with one of the candidates. Not all states along or near the boundaries between categories are close to pushing over into a neighboring group. Those most likely to switch -- those within a percentage point of the various lines of demarcation -- are included on the Watch List below.

    The Watch List1
    State
    Potential Switch
    Georgia
    from Toss Up Biden
    to Toss Up Trump
    Iowa
    from Toss Up Trump
    to Toss Up Biden
    Kansas
    from Lean Trump
    to Strong Trump
    Nevada
    from Toss Up Biden
    to Lean Biden
    New Hampshire
    from Strong Biden
    to Lean Biden
    New Mexico
    from Strong Biden
    to Lean Biden
    Ohio
    from Toss Up Trump
    to Toss Up Biden
    Pennsylvania
    from Lean Biden
    to Toss Up Biden
    1 Graduated weighted average margin within a fraction of a point of changing categories.

    --
    Methodological Note: In past years, FHQ has tried some different ways of dealing with states with no polls or just one poll in the early rounds of these projections. It does help that the least polled states are often the least competitive. The only shortcoming is that those states may be a little off in the order in the Spectrum. In earlier cycles, a simple average of the state's three previous cycles has been used. But in 2016, FHQ strayed from that and constructed an average swing from 2012 to 2016 that was applied to states. That method, however, did little to prevent anomalies like the Kansas poll that had Clinton ahead from biasing the averages. In 2016, the early average swing in the aggregate was  too small to make much difference anyway. For 2020, FHQ has utilized an average swing among states that were around a little polled state in the rank ordering on election day in 2016. If there is just one poll in Delaware in 2020, for example, then maybe it is reasonable to account for what the comparatively greater amount of polling tells us about the changes in Connecticut, New Jersey and New Mexico. Or perhaps the polling in Iowa, Mississippi and South Carolina so far tells us a bit about what may be happening in Alaska where no public polling has been released. That will hopefully work a bit better than the overall average that may end up a bit more muted.


    --
    Recent posts:




    Follow FHQ on TwitterInstagram and Facebook or subscribe by Email.

    Thursday, October 29, 2020

    The Electoral College Map (10/29/20)

    Update for October 29.


    Well, it is too bad there were not any new polls on the Thursday before the election concludes next week. Oh wait.

    With five days left in the general election campaign there was actually a flood of new state-level polling data. Here at FHQ 34 surveys from 18 states spanning all six categories were released since the last update to the projection yesterday. In two-thirds of those states, the additional polls moved the FHQ average margins in Joe Biden's direction. And that, too, encompassed states in all six categories. But President Trump was not without a silver lining in the face of all that. Margins in both Arizona and Minnesota pushed toward him on the day. However, despite another day of subtle movements, little changed in the meta-analysis. It was another date marked off the calendar in which Trump failed to meaningfully cut into Biden's advantage across the country.

    On to the polls...


    Polling Quick Hits:
    Alabama
    (Trump 58, Biden 39 via AU-Montgomery )
    [Current FHQ margin: Trump +19.88] 
    Trump 57, Biden 37 in September poll
    If this was a day that mostly maintained the status quo in the race for the White House, then the latest update from Auburn University in Montgomery is a solid lead off example. There not only was not much movement from September to now in the series, but the new poll closely tracks with the 58-38 (rounded) edge Trump has in the Yellowhammer state. Overall, that is enough to make Alabama safe for the president next week, but it is in line to shift toward the Democrats by about eight points since 2016.


    Alaska
    (Trump 52, Biden 43 via Gravis Marketing)
    [Current FHQ margin: Trump +6.34] 
    No previous Gravis poll [Current FHQ averages in Alaska: Trump 50, Biden 44 (rounded)]
    Recall that Alaska was a state where Trump barely topped 50 percent in 2016. That has been true in most polls in 2020, including this new Gravis survey of the Last Frontier. All that means that Trump has not exactly built on his win there four years ago, but he also has not lost much. Biden, on the other hand, more than seven points ahead of Clinton's 2016 share of support on election day in 2020 polling. That is enough to make Alaska more competitive, but not enough to get in the likely range of what the former vice president should expect on a really good night next Tuesday.


    Arizona
    (Trump 49, Biden 45 via Pulse Opinion Research | Biden 47, Trump 47 via Ipsos)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +2.90] 
    Pulse Opinion Research: Biden 48, Trump 46 in last poll
    Ipsos: Biden 50, Trump 46 in last poll
    If there was one state today where that broke with the status quo, it was Arizona. There was movement in the Grand Canyon state in Trump's direction in both updates released in the state today. The Pulse update to a recent poll was reminiscent of the InsiderAdvantage survey released out of Pennsylvania earlier this week. Both saw a fairly dramatic shift, poll-to-poll, from Biden to the president. And neither really matches the movement -- or lack thereof -- in October polling. Although the Pulse survey is astray of the 48-45 (rounded) advantage Biden has in Arizona at FHQ, it has Trump at the top of his range and Biden at the bottom of his. 


    Florida
    (Biden 50, Trump 46 via Monmouth | Biden 51, Trump 47 via Marist | Biden 45, Trump 42 via Quinnipiac | Biden 48, Trump 47 via Ipsos)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +3.14] 
    Monmouth: Biden 49, Trump 46 in September poll
    Marist: Biden 48, Trump 48 in September poll
    Quinnipiac: Biden 51, Trump 40 in early October poll
    Ipsos: Biden 51, Trump 46 in poll last week
    [NOTE: Using data from the high turnout Monmouth model -- a 51-45 Biden advantage -- would have increased the average FHQ margin to Biden +3.16 in Florida.]
    With the exception of the Quinnipiac survey, which updated an outlier from a couple of weeks ago, Biden benefited from the updates in the other three polls that were released in Florida today. There was not movement toward Biden in all of them, but his advantages stretched in all three. More importantly, the Democratic nominee hit 50 percent in that trio of Sunshine state surveys as well. Like the discussion about Arizona polling a day ago, there may be evidence of some narrowing in Florida as well. But it is offset by how frequently Biden has been at or above 50 percent in recent Florida polling. The former vice president has been at or beyond the majority mark in 41 of 108 surveys in the Sunshine state this year. And nearly half of that 41 -- 19 surveys -- have found Biden hitting or exceeding 50 percent in just October alone. 


    Georgia
    (Biden 48, Trump 46 via Public Policy Polling)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +0.40] 
    Biden 47, Trump 46 in early October poll
    At first glance, little change from the early October Georgia poll from PPP, but then, that is par for the course in this series in 2020. Other than the June poll in which Biden led by four, the remaining surveys have all 1) had him ahead and 2) by margins in the one to two point range. This poll not only fits that trend, but is consistent with where most of the recent polling has been in the Peach state. 


    Iowa
    (Trump 47, Biden 46 via Quinnipiac)
    [Current FHQ margin: Trump +0.64] 
    Biden, 50, Trump 45 in early October poll 
    FHQ does not know if Quinnipiac was spooked by that Florida outlier cited above, but today's batch from the university pollster seems to be a correction of some form. That may or may not be the case, but the percentage of undecideds grew from the last poll to now in three of the four polls including this Iowa survey. Only in Pennsylvania did the share of undecideds decrease. Regardless, that dynamic, whether a correction of some sort or natural movement (not really seen in other state-level polling) has closed the gap in Iowa from a poll just a couple of week ago. And it is also true that the last round of Q-polls were simple outliers and this is a regression to the mean. This Iowa poll is consistent with the 47-46 lead Trump currently holds in the FHQ averages. But that undecided shift is a curious footnote.


    Maine
    (Biden 53, Trump 39 via Survey USA)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +13.54] 

    Maine CD1
    (Biden 59, Trump 40 via Survey USA)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +23.36] 

    Maine CD2
    (Biden 51, Trump 49 via Survey USA)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +1.77] 
    No previous Survey USA poll [Current FHQ averages in ME CD2: Biden 46, Trump 45 (rounded)]
    FHQ will not dwell on this new Survey USA survey that encompassed all three jurisdictions with electoral votes at stake in the Pine Tree state. The second congressional district will be the most competitive of the bunch and the ranked choice voting-simulated version of that poll -- one that took second, third and fourth preferences -- gave the former vice president a two point edge that closely resembles the projected advantage he currently holds for that one electoral vote. There has not been a ton of polling in these two Maine districts, but what has been in the field has tended to favor Biden more often than not. 


    Michigan
    (Biden 52, Trump 42 via Mitchell Research)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +7.21] 
    Biden 51, Trump 41 in mid-October poll
    The Mitchell poll a week ago was on the upper end of the margins Biden has enjoyed in recent polling of the Great Lakes state, and the update this week ahead of the election does not look that much different. It still has Biden on the upper end of his range in the state and Trump near the bottom of his. This poll does expand the Democratic nominee's advantage in Michigan, but not by much. 


    Minnesota
    (Biden 47, Trump 42 via Survey USA)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +8.39] 
    Biden 48, Trump 42 in last week's poll
    The new Survey USA poll of Minnesota is not that different from the Michigan update above. But it is, perhaps, on the opposite end of the spectrum. There was not much change from one week to the next through a Survey USA lens that has Biden at the bottom of his October range and Trump consistent with his FHQ average share of support in the Land of 10,000 Lakes. Survey USA has also conducted three of the nine October surveys in Minnesota and has provided three of the four instances in which Biden has failed to reach 50 percent in the state. 


    Montana
    (Trump 52, Biden 45 via MSU-Billings)
    [Current FHQ margin: Trump +7.76] 
    No previous MSU-Billings poll [Current FHQ averages in Montana: Trump 51, Biden 44 (rounded)]
    First of all, this MSU-Billings survey of the Treasure state is consistent with the established FHQ average. But it also adds even more evidence to the massive potential shift there from 2016 to now. The existing Montana polling points to a more than 13 point swing toward the Democrats. That is enough to pull Montana into the Lean Trump category, but that is probably it. Still, that potential shift highlight just how uncompetitive Montana ended up being four years ago. 


    New Hampshire
    (Biden 58, Trump 39 via American Research Group | Biden 53, Trump 43 via UMass-Lowell)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +11.13] 
    American Research Group: Biden 53, Trump 44 in September poll
    UMass-Lowell: Biden 52, Trump 44 in September poll
    There was little movement in the UMass-Lowell series in the Granite state from September to now, but that was not the case in the ARG series. As surprising as it may seem, the Alabama poll above and this ARG survey of New Hampshire mirror each other. And yes, Alabama is closer than is typical of the Yellowhammer state in presidential elections, but an equivalent 19 point gap in New Hampshire grabs the attention. That is doubly true for a state that was tight in 2016 and that the president's reelection effort was targeting earlier in this cycle. [The president was just there over the weekend too.] Given a uniform swing from four years ago, New Hampshire would not be competitive necessarily, but it also would not likely by tipped nearly 20 points in Biden's direction either.


    New Jersey
    (Biden 61, Trump 37 via Rutgers/Eagleton)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +19.74] 
    Biden 56, Trump 33 (among registered voters) in May poll
    That Biden has hit 60 percent in the update to May's Rutgers/Eagleton poll of New Jersey is noteworthy in and of itself. He has only reached those heights in a couple of the Survey Monkey polls of the Garden state this year. But it also serves to highlight just how little the former vice president has improved on Clinton's showing in New Jersey four years ago. It stands out as the exception rather than the rule. The president, on the other hand, has been consistently in the upper 30s there, a little more than four points off his 2016 pace there.


    North Carolina
    (Biden 48, Trump 45 via Siena/NYT Upshot | Biden 48, Trump 48 via UMass-Lowell)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +1.85] 
    Siena: Biden 46, Trump 42 in earlier October poll
    UMass-Lowell: Biden 47, Trump 47 in September poll
    The Citizen Data survey (described as part of the collective wave below) did all the heavy lifting in pushing the FHQ average margin in North Carolina closer to Biden +2, but the other two polls of the Tar Heel state released today maintained the status quo. Neither the Siena nor the UMass-Lowell surveys saw any substantial shifts from the last polls in those respective series and neither update differs much from the range of polls out of North Carolina in October (or the rest of the year for that matter). Biden continues to maintain a 48-46 (rounded) advantage at FHQ.


    Ohio
    (Trump 49, Biden 47 via Gravis Marketing | Biden 48, Trump 43 via Quinnipiac)
    [Current FHQ margin: Trump +0.67] 
    No previous Gravis poll
    Quinnipiac: Biden 48, Trump 47 in mid-October poll
    While the first Gravis poll in the Buckeye state is in line with the small lead that Trump has had there throughout much of 2020, the Quinnipiac survey is not. But unlike the Florida and Iowa Q-polls, the one in Ohio swung toward Biden and not the president. It did, however, see the share of undecideds grow from the previous poll in the series. That drew in the margin, pushing Ohio closer to the partisan line, but the Buckeye state remains a state that is close but slightly tilted toward the president. The wiggle room in Ohio polling is that neither candidate has really been north of 50 percent much all year. Of the 42 polls that have been in the field there in 2020, Trump has hit or surpassed the majority mark only eight times and Biden has only done so in three surveys. Trump is the only one to get there in October, but even then, only once.


    Pennsylvania
    (Biden 51, Trump 45 via RMG Research | Biden 51, Trump 44 via Quinnipiac | Biden 50, Trump 44 via Franklin and Marshall)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +5.41] 
    RMG Research: Biden 49, Trump 43 in earlier October poll
    Quinnipiac: Biden 51, Trump 43 in earlier October poll
    Franklin and Marshall: Biden 48, Trump 42 in September poll
    If there is any new Pennsylvania poll out, then odds are it will have Biden around 50 percent and Trump somewhere in the mid-40s. All three polls fit that mold today, and while both the RMG and the Franklin and Marshall polls showed positive movement for both candidates, both new surveys maintained the margins from the previous polls in each series. This string of polls nudged Biden that much closer to 50 percent in the averages at FHQ as well.


    Texas
    (Trump 48, Biden 47 via UMass-Lowell)
    [Current FHQ margin: Trump +1.40] 
    UMass-Lowell: Trump 49, Biden 46 in September poll 
    Minimal movement from one UMass-Lowell survey of Texas to the next did little to change the outlook in the Lone Star state. Trump still has the advantage in a state that continues to look like the North Carolina of the Trump side of the partisan line: close, but consistently tipped toward the president. And like North Carolina, it was the Citizen Data survey that triggered the changes in the Texas average margin.


    Vermont
    (Biden 62, Trump 32 via co/efficient)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +36.71] 
    No previous co/efficient poll [Current FHQ averages in Vermont: Biden 66, Trump 30 (rounded)]
    A rare Vermont poll failed to offer any real suspense. The Green Mountain state is a heavy Biden lean off on the far left end of the order on the Electoral College Spectrum, and other than Biden ending up closer to 60 percent rather than 70 percent, this poll -- an internal Republican survey for the lieutenant governor's race in Vermont -- did not stray too far from what one might expect. Still, Vermont is one of those states where the 2020 polling relative to where the candidates ended up in 2016 is a tad askew. While Trump hovers near where he was in Vermont -- lagging less than a point behind his 2016 pace -- Biden is more than nine points out in front of Clinton from four years ago. 


    Virginia
    (Biden 51, Trump 39 via Virginia Commonwealth)
    [Current FHQ margin: Biden +11.84] 
    Biden 53, Trump 39 in September poll 
    In the Old Dominion, Biden lost a couple of points in the VCU poll since its last survey in September. Both candidates fall a couple of points shy of their FHQ average shares of support in this latest update, but the margin is right on target. That further cements Virginia as something other than  the battleground it has been in recent cycles. 


    Citizen Data (October battleground polls -- initial wave of releases):
    Ohio: Trump 44, Biden 43
    Texas: Biden 49, Trump 45
    Georgia: Biden 48, Trump 44
    Florida: Biden 50, Trump 45
    Pennsylvania: Biden 44, Trump 39
    North Carolina: Biden 50, Trump 44
    Michigan: Biden 50, Trump 41

    This strange set of polls from Citizen Data was made all the more strange by the correction it had to make to a Texas poll that initially (and mistakenly) indicated that Biden was ahead by ten points. A four point lead for the vice president in the Lone Star state is already off to the extreme Biden end of of the range in Texas polling. If that was not enough, the order of states in this wave is not at all consistent with the established order at FHQ. North Carolina being to the Biden side of both Florida and Pennsylvania stands out, but then again the undecideds/others-inflated totals in that survey of the Keystone state do as well. 



    NOTE: 


    The Electoral College Spectrum1
    DC-3
    VT-3
    (6)2
    IL-20
    (162)
    WI-10
    (253)
    AK-3
    (125)
    TN-11
    (60)
    MA-11
    (17)
    NJ-14
    (176)
    PA-203
    (273 | 285)
    MO-10
    (122)
    KY-8
    (49)
    MD-10
    (27)
    OR-7
    (183)
    NV-6
    (279 | 265)
    SC -9
    (112)
    SD-3
    (41)
    HI-4
    (31)
    ME-2
    (185)
    FL-29
    (308 | 259)
    MT-3
    NE CD1-1
    (103)
    AL-9
    (38)
    NY-29
    (60)
    CO-9
    (194)
    AZ-11
    (319 | 230)
    KS-6
    (99)
    ID-4
    (29)
    CA-55
    (115)
    VA-13
    (207)
    NC-15
    ME CD2-1
    (335 | 219)
    NE-2
    (93)
    AR-6
    (25)
    DE-3
    (118)
    NH-4
    (211)
    GA-16
    (351 | 203)
    IN-11
    (91)
    OK-7
    (19)
    WA-12
    (130)
    NM-5
    (216)
    IA-6
    (187)
    UT-6
    (80)
    ND-3
    (12)
    ME CD1-1
    CT-7
    (138)
    MN-10
    (226)
    OH-18
    (181)
    MS-6
    (74)
    WV-5
    (9)
    RI-4
    (142)
    NE CD2-1
    MI-16
    (243)
    TX-38
    (163)
    LA-8
    (68)
    WY-3
    NE CD3-1
    (4)
    1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

    2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he or she won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Trump won all the states up to and including Pennsylvania (Biden's toss up states plus the Pennsylvania), he would have 285 electoral votes. Trump's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Biden's number is on the left and Trump's is on the right in bold italics.

    3 Pennsylvania
     is the state where Biden crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election, the tipping point state. The tipping point cell is shaded in yellow to denote that and the font color is adjusted to attempt to reflect the category in which the state is.

    On the weight of two new polls -- especially that ARG poll -- New Hampshire shifts off the Watch List. It is now outside of a point of moving into the Lean Biden category and is a more comfortable Strong Biden state. 

    Similarly, a wide margin in the latest New Jersey poll pushed the Garden state past Oregon in the order and one cell away from the partisan line. New Jersey is a safe Strong Biden state as well.

    But again, this was another day of subtle changes here at FHQ and not the sort of big changes that the president needs at this late date. The electoral vote tally remains at Biden, 351-187 despite the changes further out in the order on the Spectrum and on the Watch List. 

    5 days to go.


    Where things stood at FHQ on October 29 (or close to it) in...
    2016
    2012
    2008


    --
    NOTE: Distinctions are made between states based on how much they favor one candidate or another. States with a margin greater than 10 percent between Biden and Trump are "Strong" states. Those with a margin of 5 to 10 percent "Lean" toward one of the two (presumptive) nominees. Finally, states with a spread in the graduated weighted averages of both the candidates' shares of polling support less than 5 percent are "Toss Up" states. The darker a state is shaded in any of the figures here, the more strongly it is aligned with one of the candidates. Not all states along or near the boundaries between categories are close to pushing over into a neighboring group. Those most likely to switch -- those within a percentage point of the various lines of demarcation -- are included on the Watch List below.

    The Watch List1
    State
    Potential Switch
    Georgia
    from Toss Up Biden
    to Toss Up Trump
    Iowa
    from Toss Up Trump
    to Toss Up Biden
    Kansas
    from Lean Trump
    to Strong Trump
    Nevada
    from Toss Up Biden
    to Lean Biden
    New Mexico
    from Strong Biden
    to Lean Biden
    Ohio
    from Toss Up Trump
    to Toss Up Biden
    Pennsylvania
    from Lean Biden
    to Toss Up Biden
    1 Graduated weighted average margin within a fraction of a point of changing categories.

    --
    Methodological Note: In past years, FHQ has tried some different ways of dealing with states with no polls or just one poll in the early rounds of these projections. It does help that the least polled states are often the least competitive. The only shortcoming is that those states may be a little off in the order in the Spectrum. In earlier cycles, a simple average of the state's three previous cycles has been used. But in 2016, FHQ strayed from that and constructed an average swing from 2012 to 2016 that was applied to states. That method, however, did little to prevent anomalies like the Kansas poll that had Clinton ahead from biasing the averages. In 2016, the early average swing in the aggregate was  too small to make much difference anyway. For 2020, FHQ has utilized an average swing among states that were around a little polled state in the rank ordering on election day in 2016. If there is just one poll in Delaware in 2020, for example, then maybe it is reasonable to account for what the comparatively greater amount of polling tells us about the changes in Connecticut, New Jersey and New Mexico. Or perhaps the polling in Iowa, Mississippi and South Carolina so far tells us a bit about what may be happening in Alaska where no public polling has been released. That will hopefully work a bit better than the overall average that may end up a bit more muted.


    --
    Related posts:




    Follow FHQ on TwitterInstagram and Facebook or subscribe by Email.